Author(s): Dr. G. Parimala, Mr. P. Prasangi

Abstract: This paper presents literature as a reflection of human experiences through a comparative study of Murder in the Cathedral by T. S. Eliot and Doctor Faustus by Christopher Marlowe, focusing on their exploration of temptation, moral conflict, and human decision-making. While Eliot’s play portrays temptation as an internal, spiritual struggle that requires self-awareness and purity of intention, Marlowe’s tragedy presents it as a combination of ambition and external influence leading to moral downfall. Through close textual analysis and comparative interpretation, the study highlights the contrasting responses of Thomas Becket and Faustus, emphasizing the role of individual choice and responsibility. In addition, the paper incorporates a reflective dimension, demonstrating how these texts contribute to a deeper understanding of personal ethical and moral challenges. It argues that both works extend beyond their literary significance to function as guides for recognizing and resisting temptation in everyday life.

Keywords: Temptation, Moral Conflict, Ethical Decision-Making, Self-Awareness, Ambition, Spiritual Integrity, Tragedy, Human Choice, Literature and Ethics

Article Info: Received: 20 Jan 2026; Received in revised form: 19 Feb 2026; Accepted: 25 Feb 2026; Available online: 28 Feb 2026

DOI: 10.22161/ijels.111.73