Author(s): Muhsina CK

Abstract: This paper examines Elif Shafak’s The Forty Rules of Love (2009) through Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics of suspicion and faith. Ricoeur conceives interpretation as a dialectic: suspicion unmasks hidden ideologies, distortions, and unconscious motives, while faith seeks to restore meaning, trust, and openness to the text. Shafak’s novel, which interlaces the story of Ella, a disillusioned American housewife, with the thirteenth-century friendship between Rumi and Shams of Tabriz, illustrates this dynamic. Ella’s skepticism toward love, religion, and convention reflects the suspicious stance, questioning cultural norms and personal illusions. Yet, the Sufi teachings embodied in Shams and Rumi cultivate faith, offering renewal through love, transcendence, and spiritual transformation. Reading the novel through Ricoeur thus highlights how literature operates as both critique and affirmation, deconstructing rigid ideologies while reconstructing meaning. The novel affirms Ricoeur’s claim that genuine understanding emerges in the tension between suspicion and faith, making space for identity, hope, and love.

Keywords: Hermenutics of fatih, Hermenutics of suspicion; Mysticism; conflicts of interpretations; Symbols.

Article Info: Received: 11 Sep 2025; Received in revised form: 07 Oct 2025; Accepted: 11 Oct 2025; Available online: 16 Oct 2025

DOI: 10.22161/ijels.105.64